It would appear our United States Secret Service (SS) has started an Obama directed witch hunt against the opponents of "The One," one Barry Obama, a native of Kenya, who was elected President of the United States on the basis of ACORN stolen votes.
In fact, the witch hunt started BEFORE "The Messiah" was elected president, as a recent conviction in California indicates.
Yes, it is just dandy for Leftards to write books, make movies and threaten Republican Presidents like George W. Bush; the SS will yawn in boredom; however, when a neo-fascist Leftard power monger like Obama is elected First Citizen free speech in criticism of "The Great Helmsman" Obama is forbidden.
Those who don't get the meaning of The New Realities in this country may end up on a ten year cruise of the FEDERAL GULAG (Also called Bureau of Prisons - The BOP) like Walter Bagdasarian of La Mesa, California. All expenses paid, of course, along with free room, board and Obamanation Brain Washing done for free at FCI Butner, North Carolina.
The clothing is free as well, but only comes in only one color.
One would think that if the SS were in reality an honest agency of federal law enforcement they would have already arrested our Mussolini wanna-be president who has in only six months in office used the U.S. Constitution as toilet paper to wipe his very dirty collectivist brown butt.
I could be wrong, but isn't that treason?
On the other hand can a native of Kenya, or any country for that matter, commit treason against the United States? This a question for the courts. I'm no legal scholar, but wouldn't a foreigner who illegally becomes the President of the United States be guilty of some offense that would merit being executed by a military firing squad at dawn after being found guilty by a Military Tribunal?
One would think the 5,000 Special Agents of the SS would look at high treason with a serious Eagle Eye rather than riot about the 3.5 million square miles of the USA and arrest every citizen who points out that the King Has No Clothes, and whose continued stay in the Oval Office constitutes the single most serious threat to the Republic since Robert E. Lee and his Army of Northern Virginia stood at The Gates of Gettysburg.
Once again our very own U.S. Secret Service has proven Orwell was right: "Big Brother is watching you!"
ARTICLES:
Obama increasingly unpopular; once threatened
July 28, 2009· Alberto Vargas - San Diego Community Issues Examiner
President Obama’s popularity has been nose-diving in recent weeks. Many have used this information to make the argument that the people of America have woken up from a deep slumber, stupor, trance of the Obama campaign machine that handed him the presidency.
Obama-mania, as Sean Hannity frequently refers to the unstoppable swell from voters in support of the president, seems to be rapidly subsiding.
According to the latest Rasmussen Report, 32% of the nation’s voters Strongly Approve of the way Obama is fulfilling his role as president. 40% now Strongly Disapprove. This leaves the president with an Approval Index rating of - 8.
These numbers seem a far cry from the hopeful optimism that shook the nation while Obama was running for president, promising a new era of change and hope. Regardless of whether he is making the right decisions or not, the public seems to be running out of patience with him.
Conservatives cannot stand for what they call Obama’s socialist views. They strongly disapprove of his power-hungry means of taking over several of the most important industries in our country.
So-called blue-dog democrats are refusing – thus far – to go along with the administration’s proposed healthcare reform. Generally speaking, there is a growing sense that the nation does not like what President Obama is doing to the nation.
This, even before the elections, has left a very bitter taste in the mouths of many Americans. He’s been a polarizing figure, thus far.
To this end, a La Mesa man has recently been charged and convicted of threatening to kill the president. This apparently took place during the presidential campaign. Had this man not been arrested, one can only wonder what he would’ve said or threatened to do now that the president has lost his popularity; and confirmed many people’s fears.
Walter Bagdasarian said the country would essentially fall apart during an Obama presidency and went so far as to suggest assassination. Marilyn Huff, U. S. District Court judge expressed that such threats are sufficient grounds to find the man guilty of “two counts of making threats against a major candidate for president of the United States.”
Bagdasarian chose to forego his right to a jury trial. As such, he is scheduled to face sentencing on October 26. He faces the possibility of a maximum of 10 years in prison for these threats.
His defense attorney argued that the man was drunk during his tirades, which were posted on-line on the Yahoo Finance message board. His attorney also brought up the First Amendment right to freedom of speech. He also made the argument that his client had no real intent of following through with the threats and cited the man later apologized for having posted such violent comments.
The judge reiterated, “You have freedom of expression…but the wonderful protections of the First Amendment are not without responsibility. The defendant intended the statement to be taken as a threat.”
Today, many might argue that the 47-year-old La Mesa man was on to something when he warned that “the country would fall apart during” the Obama presidency. What they won’t agree is that threatening somebody with assassination is not exactly the most democratic means of mounting political opposition.
The voice of the individual is important and must not be silenced.
MORE
SOURCE
July 28, 2009· Alberto Vargas - San Diego Community Issues Examiner
President Obama’s popularity has been nose-diving in recent weeks. Many have used this information to make the argument that the people of America have woken up from a deep slumber, stupor, trance of the Obama campaign machine that handed him the presidency.
Obama-mania, as Sean Hannity frequently refers to the unstoppable swell from voters in support of the president, seems to be rapidly subsiding.
According to the latest Rasmussen Report, 32% of the nation’s voters Strongly Approve of the way Obama is fulfilling his role as president. 40% now Strongly Disapprove. This leaves the president with an Approval Index rating of - 8.
These numbers seem a far cry from the hopeful optimism that shook the nation while Obama was running for president, promising a new era of change and hope. Regardless of whether he is making the right decisions or not, the public seems to be running out of patience with him.
Conservatives cannot stand for what they call Obama’s socialist views. They strongly disapprove of his power-hungry means of taking over several of the most important industries in our country.
So-called blue-dog democrats are refusing – thus far – to go along with the administration’s proposed healthcare reform. Generally speaking, there is a growing sense that the nation does not like what President Obama is doing to the nation.
This, even before the elections, has left a very bitter taste in the mouths of many Americans. He’s been a polarizing figure, thus far.
To this end, a La Mesa man has recently been charged and convicted of threatening to kill the president. This apparently took place during the presidential campaign. Had this man not been arrested, one can only wonder what he would’ve said or threatened to do now that the president has lost his popularity; and confirmed many people’s fears.
Walter Bagdasarian said the country would essentially fall apart during an Obama presidency and went so far as to suggest assassination. Marilyn Huff, U. S. District Court judge expressed that such threats are sufficient grounds to find the man guilty of “two counts of making threats against a major candidate for president of the United States.”
Bagdasarian chose to forego his right to a jury trial. As such, he is scheduled to face sentencing on October 26. He faces the possibility of a maximum of 10 years in prison for these threats.
His defense attorney argued that the man was drunk during his tirades, which were posted on-line on the Yahoo Finance message board. His attorney also brought up the First Amendment right to freedom of speech. He also made the argument that his client had no real intent of following through with the threats and cited the man later apologized for having posted such violent comments.
The judge reiterated, “You have freedom of expression…but the wonderful protections of the First Amendment are not without responsibility. The defendant intended the statement to be taken as a threat.”
Today, many might argue that the 47-year-old La Mesa man was on to something when he warned that “the country would fall apart during” the Obama presidency. What they won’t agree is that threatening somebody with assassination is not exactly the most democratic means of mounting political opposition.
The voice of the individual is important and must not be silenced.
MORE
SOURCE
0 comments:
Post a Comment