Thursday, August 05, 2010

OBAMA HAS NO LEGAL RIGHT TO BE PRESIDENT

Enough For A Rebellion


The founding fathers decreed that any candidate for American President must be born in America. They specified this to avoid the danger of anyone with mixed national loyalties becoming President, and either intentionally or unintentionally, putting US interests second on the world stage or in any global conflict.

Therefore anyone who desires the Presidency must first of all pass that simple test. Was he/ she born in the US? If this cannot be verified, then that person is immediately disqualified as a candidate. At the moment, each nominated candidate is sworn to be of US birth by the political party they represent on the registration papers accompanying his nomination. Once this sworn statement has been accepted by that part of the legislature governing elections, the candidate is free to run and become President if elected.

What though if this sworn statement was made falsely? What if as a result of a false swearing, a foreign born person is elected and shows signs of disloyalty to the US. Should something be done about this?

This is the Presidency of the United States. Of course something should be done. Especially when the President is Barack Obama and the predictions of potential disloyalty show every sign of being realised.

Barack Hussein Obama was sworn to be a citizen of the US by Nancy Pelosi. On every state registration certificate (other than Hawaii) the wording of the registration clause was altered. Why this change was made has never been explained by Pelosi or anyone.

The real question is this- How was Pelosi able to certify Barack Obama as eligible and born in the US when there is no “evidence” of this other than 1) a Certificate of Live Birth, extremely questionable on the grounds that it is yet to be proved as legitimate and also because it is a document that has in the past routinely been provided to citizens born internationally, and 2) the presence of two birth announcements in his parents home town newspapers which could have been inserted for any number of reasons and do not in any way really guarantee Obama’s birth in Hawaii?

There are though a surfeit of international and local newspaper articles from when Obama was running for the senate (and later) that describe Obama as Kenyan born. There is an original certificate, yet to be proved as illegitimate, that nominates Obama’s birth place as Kenya. There is the debate, heard by thousands, wherein Alan Keyes raised the matter of Obama’s Kenyan birth with him and stated it would prevent Barack from running for President and Obama responded with the comment that it was not relevant as he (at the time) was only running for the senate.

Most telling of all is Obama’s refusal to allow any scrutiny of documents relating to his past, and the expenditure of millions of dollars in legal fees to keep the birth documents reportedly on file in Hawaii from public view.

None of the above is convincing proof that Obama is a counterfeit President, but it is at least grounds for an enquiry and, if it is proved he was born outside of the US, impeachment and imprisonment of Obama and Pelosi.

There is no enquiry, for Obama’s media shills (Journolisters?) have conspired to create a political atmosphere that is extremely punishing to anyone who dares raise the issue. Anyone calling for Obama to clarify questions regarding his natural born status is immediately shouted down or scorned with derisory comments or allegations of insanity. The Republicans and even the alternative media has been totally intimidated by the venom and intensity of Obama’s media attack dogs. This demonstrates once again the utter corruption of the US political system at the hands of a partisan and fraudulent mainstream media conglomerate. If they were doing their job (anyone remember Watergate?) this scandal would be exposed and a fraudulent President would be impeached and prosecuted.

The legitimacy of the President of the United States of America should never be in doubt. As the drafters of the Constitution intended, there should never be any question regarding the loyalty of the person holding this office. Right now, both of those essentials remain uncertain. Barack Obama could remove that uncertainty by responding to legitimate questions concerning his place of birth but he refuses to do so, and the corrupt mainstream media continue to cover for him. The US has been bought to as tenuous a political position as has ever existed in its modern history, and by a President who most probably has no right to hold office. I often wonder where all the true patriots have gone and why so little is said about something so critical to the security of the country. This is enough I think for a rebellion.

H/T CRUSADER RABBIT

0 comments: