Wednesday, February 29, 2012


...And you still say the Federal Government shouldn't be overthrown in a Second American Revolution?

Via Rolling Stone:

As Occupy Wall Street spread across the nation last fall, sparking protests in more than 70 cities, the Department of Homeland Security began keeping tabs on the movement. An internal DHS report entitled “SPECIAL COVERAGE: Occupy Wall Street,” dated October of last year, opens with the observation that “mass gatherings associated with public protest movements can have disruptive effects on transportation, commercial, and government services, especially when staged in major metropolitan areas.” While acknowledging the overwhelmingly peaceful nature of OWS, the report notes darkly that “large scale demonstrations also carry the potential for violence, presenting a significant challenge for law enforcement.”

The five-page report – contained in 5 million newly leaked documents examined by Rolling Stone in an investigative partnership with WikiLeaks – goes on to sum up the history of Occupy Wall Street and assess its “impact” on everything from financial services to government facilities. Many of the observations are benign, and appear to have been culled from publicly available sources. The report notes, for instance, that in Chicago “five women were arrested after dumping garbage taken from a foreclosed home owned by Bank of America in the lobby one of the bank’s branches,” and that “OWS in New York staged a ‘Millionaires March,’ from Zucotti Park to demonstrate outside the homes of some of the city’s richest residents.”

But the DHS also appears to have scoured OWS-related Twitter feeds for much of their information. The report includes a special feature on what it calls Occupy’s “social media and IT usage,” and provides an interactive map of protests and gatherings nationwide – borrowed, improbably enough, from the lefty blog Daily Kos. “Social media and the organic emergence of online communities,” the report notes, “have driven the rapid expansion of the OWS movement.”

The most ominous aspect of the report, however, comes in its final paragraph:

“The growing support for the OWS movement has expanded the protests’ impact and increased the potential for violence. While the peaceful nature of the protests has served so far to mitigate their impact, larger numbers and support from groups such as Anonymous substantially increase the risk for potential incidents and enhance the potential security risk to critical infrastructure (CI). The continued expansion of these protests also places an increasingly heavy burden on law enforcement and movement organizers to control protesters. As the primary target of the demonstrations, financial services stands the sector most impacted by the OWS protests. Due to the location of the protests in major metropolitan areas, heightened and continuous situational awareness for security personnel across all CI sectors is encouraged.”

Keep reading…

Know A Tree By It’s Fruit A Commentary by J. D. Longstreet

I am genuinely surprised when people approach me and ask my thoughts on Mitt Romney. I invariably ask why they want to know and the reply they offer most often is that they really don’t know the man.

That is when I really want to grab them by both shoulders, shake them, and declare: “PAY ATTENTION!”

The scriptures tell us: “You shall know a tree by the fruit it bears.” In Matthew 7:16 it is said: “You will know them by their fruits. Grapes are not gathered from thorn bushes nor figs from thistles, are they?”

In the New Testament book of James, the third chapter and the twelfth verse, we are informed thusly: “My brothers, can a fig tree bear olives, or a grapevine bear figs? Neither can a salt spring produce fresh water.”

In other words a man is what he is – period. If you want to know WHAT he is, what he believes, then pay attention to what he does. His accomplishments are the “fruits of his labors.” Those fruits will define him completely.

Remember George W. Bush's “Compassionate Conservatism?” Well, that was, in fact, code for “moderate.” G.W. was a moderate AT BEST.

Mitt Romney is a liberal … moderate on some things … but at the core he is a liberal. It is something the conservative base of the GOP knows instinctually and that is why they are avoiding support of Romney at all costs, even if that cost is the loss of the election to Obama in November.

I am old enough to remember the “Me Too” republicans. Ever hear of them? You’d have to harken back to the days of Nelson Rockefeller and the Rockefeller wing of the Republican Party in the 1960’s. (There is an excellent article on this HERE.)

Even then, the liberal wing of the GOP was based in America’s northeastern states. It still is today.

Mitt Romney was governor of Massachusetts a liberal state if there ever has been one. There is no way under the sun a conservative can be elected governor of Massachusetts. Yet, Mitt Romney was -- and he would have us believe he is a conservative. This fact alone should be enough evidence to convinced anyone that Mr. Romney is no conservative. He is a solid member of the Rockefeller wing of the Republican Party. In 1964 we called them the “Me Too” republicans. Today we call them RINO’s. (Republican In Name Only)

Ever since conservatives began to grow in power within the Republican Party there has been an internal war raging for control of the party. In 1960, Richard Nixon managed to merge the two factions of the GOP into one concentrated effort. But -- just four years afterwards Nelson Rockefeller could not. And he was furious. He led an unprecedented attack on the GOP conservatives that failed but left massive scars on the GOP base that are still swollen and sensitive today.

Like Rockefeller, Romney is where he is because he was “next in line.” It is “his turn” in accordance with the way the northeastern liberals ran the party. (They have yet to learn that they no longer control the Republican Party.) GOP voters were simple told that Romney is the “frontrunner” … no matter that Romney did not have the strength that comes from the support of the party faithful – including the conservative base of the party today.

The so-called “republican establishment,” somehow, missed the fact that the power in the GOP switched from the northeastern states to the southern states years ago. They also seem to have been oblivious of the inherent distrust of northeastern politicians in the south, which is left over from “Reconstruction” of the South immediately following the American Civil War a hundred and fifty years ago. (Painful memories tend to last much longer than pleasant memories.)

Michael Gerson is an op-ed columnist for The Washington Post, a Policy Fellow with the ONE Campaign, and a former senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. He served as President George W. Bush’s chief speechwriter from 2001 until June 2006, as a senior policy advisor from 2000 through June 2006. Mr. Gerson once described Romney this way: "Romney's main political vulnerability is a serious one. Running for Massachusetts' governor in 2002, he was a pro-choice, economically centrist, and culturally liberal, business oriented Republican."

You DID see “pro-choice,” “centrist,” and “liberal” in Mr. Gerson’s description of Mitt Romney above, didn’t you?

Yes, as a conservative I want to deprive Obama of a second term as President. But I do not want to swap one liberal for another. Besides, we have the likelihood of two vacancies on the US Supreme Court coming up in the next four to five years and it is vital that there be a conservative in the White House to appoint two conservative justices.

Romney cannot pull the two factions of the GOP together. He may win the nomination but he will not win the election against Obama. The GOP’s “Anybody But Obama” strategy will not work. It is doomed to failure. It is as simple – AND -- as sad as that. And yes, it IS depressing.

J. D. Longstreet


UPI ^ | February 28, 2012

DETROIT, Feb. 28 (UPI) -- Mitt Romney was a double winner Tuesday, capturing the Michigan and Arizona Republican presidential primaries, results showed.

The Detroit Free Press declared Romney the victor over his GOP rivals in Michigan.

With about 74 percent of the precincts counted, Romney had 317,258 votes (41 percent) to Rick Santorum's 286,530 (37 percent), results posted by the Free Press showed. Ron Paul was third with 88,521 votes (12 percent) and Newt Gingrich followed with 50,726 votes (7 percent). Another 2 percent voted "uncommitted" and a handful of votes went to several other Republicans who are no longer contenders.

CNN called Romney the winner in Arizona. With 71 percent of the vote counted, Romney had 191,182 votes (48 percent) to Santorum's 101,232 votes (25 percent). Gingrich was third with 65,182 votes (16 percent), with Paul bringing up the rear with 33,505 votes (8 percent).

Exit polls in the two states Tuesday had indicated electability was the top priority among Republican primary voters.

Thirty-three percent of Michigan voters said beating President Obama is the top priority when selecting a GOP nominee, while 38 percent of voters in Arizona said the same, CBS News exit polls indicated.

Romney and Santorum slashed at each other ahead of the Michigan primary, which was too close to call. The contest in his home state is seen as crucial to Romney and his claim of the front-runner's mantle.

Despite the closeness of the Michigan race, the Post said Romney was expected to win about three times as many convention delegates as Santorum Tuesday. Arizona is a winner-take-all primary. Michigan's 30 delegates are allotted proportionately to the primary winner in each of the state's 14 congressional districts. Arizona's winner picks up all of its 29 delegates.

The Washington Post said Romney was expected to garner 45 delegates from both contests, with Santorum picking up about 15.

Gingrich and Paul were not expected to win any delegates, and did not seriously campaign in the two states.

Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, and Santorum, a former U.S. senator from Pennsylvania, have been shooting fireballs at each other in recent days.

Romney blasted Santorum's use of robocalls urging Democrats, who can vote GOP in Michigan, to vote for Santorum.

"I know why [President] Obama doesn't want me to face him but I just think it's outrageous and a terrible dirty trick at the last hour, by the way, late in the afternoon on the day before the election, maybe hoping no one would notice, they start sending out calls to Democrats, union members telling them to go into the Republican primary and vote against Mitt Romney," Romney told Fox News.

"This is a new low for his campaign and that's saying something," he added.

Santorum told Fox News Monday night he's just trying to attract the Democratic voters he'll need in November.

"When he runs a robocall of my voice from four years ago saying good things about him, that's not a low moment, and when I run a call basically saying, calling Democrats that are eligible to vote here, to vote for us, that's a low?" he said.


Tuesday, February 28, 2012


Exclusive Interview: Infidel Victim of Pennsylvania Sharia Judge Reveals Inside Details of Case

By Pamela Geller

This is why anti-sharia legislation is so essential. What happened to equal protection under the law?

Back in October, I reported on Ernest Perce, a parade-goer wearing a "Zombie Muhammad" costume while marching in a local Pennsylvania Halloween parade. He was viciously attacked and choked by Talaag Elbayomy, a Muslim (who was enforcing the sharia -- he assumed that it was illegal in this country to insult Muhammad). "He grabbed me, choked me from the back, and spun me around to try to get my sign off that was wrapped around my neck," reported Perce.

Last week, an American judge in Pennsylvania, Judge Mark Martin, ruled on the case and sided with the Muslim, and said that the victim would have been put to death in Muslim societies for his "crime."

Martin told Perce: "Having had the benefit of having spent over two and a half years in predominantly Muslim countries I think I know a little bit about the faith of Islam. ... In many Arabic-speaking countries something like this is definitely against the law there. In their society in fact it can be punishable by death and it frequently is in their society."

So what? This is America, where we don't have to obey the Islamic blasphemy laws -- at least not yet. But Martin went on to reveal why he was ruling against the victim: "Then what you have done is you have completely trashed their essence, their being. They find it very very very offensive. I'm a Muslim, I find it offensive." He now denies that he is a Muslim, but that's what he said.

Ultimately, it is irrelevant if the judge is or isn't a Muslim. What is germane is his sharia ruling, which is worse if he's not a Muslim. In Islam, sharia supersedes all man-made laws. It is the law of Allah, so one might understand (though not condone) a Muslim judge defaulting to sharia. But an American judge admonishing an infidel victim while holding up the Koran is shocking. You hear the Koran slam down in the audio of the court proceeding. Martin also told Perce: "You're way outside your boundaries or First Amendment rights."

Perce had video of the attack, but Judge Martin refused to allow the video into evidence. The judge refused even to look at the video, saying that he had heard enough and that there were two conflicting stories. In sharia, in any conflict between a Muslim and a non-Muslim, the Muslim is always right. Martin ruled for Elbayomy.

It gets worse. Since his ordeal began, the infidel victim, Ernest Perce, has received 471 verifiable threats. Perce never released any personal information on Judge Martin or Elbayomy, but they released his, and now he has gotten threats at his home. He may also soon be spending time in jail because he released audio of the court proceeding. Martin is threatening to hold Perce in contempt of court for releasing the audio, even though Perce says he was given permission to release it.

Perce released the video because he believes that he was treated unfairly -- that Martin showed Elbayomy preferential treatment. He wrote to Bonnie Snyder, administrative secretary of the Cumberland County District Court: "I was in a recent proceeding and Judge Martin gave both parties the right/permission to record the proceeding on our cellular devices. I would like to know if it is allowed to put the recording online for listening purposes. If the answer is no, I'd like to know the case law which is being cited and the punishment for violating the case law."

Snyder responded: "Judge Martin only gave permission for the attorney or officer to record the proceedings. He did not give anyone else permission to record anything in the courtroom at the hearing held on December 6, 2011 at 2:45 pm."

Perce then asked her: "Are you instructing me via Judge Martin to destroy or delete and not use my audio recording?"

Answered Snyder: "Yes, since you were not authorized to make any recordings."

Are we living in a sharia state? Aren't court cases open to the public?

Recently I interviewed Ernest Perce and asked him why Judge Martin did not allow the video of the attack to be shown.

Perce: Judge would be offended! Yet they used comments made on the video at YouTube two months later to establish that I had a biased view toward Talaag Elbayomy. If the judge were honest, he would have said, "Attorney, the video is not entered as evidence, and therefore I cannot use the comment from two months after the supposed attack."

I called demanding to speak to the judge. He was always in a training session or in court. Finally, on February 16, I talked with the judge at 3:42PM, and he said, "I will hold you in contempt of court under section 42 of the Judicial System" if I didn't take down the audio. He also threatened to hold me in violation of 112 of the Rules of Court Section D.

He also said that I would be held in contempt of court. He denies this now, but this is what he told me. He was furious.

PG: Why did you decide to dress as Zombie Muhammad for Halloween in the first place?

Perce: Mainly to stand for the freedom of speech, and to show my disdain for such a hateful religion and culture. I have always made fun of Muhammad.

PG: When did you start receiving threats?

Perce: I started receiving death threats immediately after putting the video online of the parade. People have said that they would kill me, rip my eyes out, run me over, shoot me and laugh at me, since I have blasphemed Muhammad. They say I will be found out and [hanged] in front of my family.

PG: Did you report these threats? If so, what response did you receive?

Perce: I have reported several of the threats.

PG: What is your reaction to the judge's telling you that what you did was offensive to Muslims?

Perce: When I first heard Attorney Thomas, the defendant's attorney, telling me to read the Koran and the judge stayed silent, I was stunned. Then when the judge said, " I have a Koran; I challenge you to show me where it says Mohammed [rose] from the dead," I was stunned. I remember thinking "In America, what does it matter what interpretation a person has about a ruthless book?" I thought, "I'm not going to challenge you to a debate, and who in the hell are you to require me to read a Koran?"

This is America! Freedom of speech is our birthright. This judge trampled on the Constitution. At that point I forgot I was recording. Do you think he thinks that being offended justifies harassment? There is no doubt that he believes that offensive speech warrants harassment.

PG: What do you think of Judge Martin's office denying that he is a Muslim?

Perce: Remember, a Muslim can lie to a nonbeliever, a kaffir. He spoke Arabic to the defendant and his friend. They answered back. If he claims he isn't a Muslim, then why does he have a Koran? Why did he challenge me to a debate on the interpretation of the Koran? Why get mad at me and insult me? Why then go on a six-minute rant against me? Why value Islam above Christianity? He said, "They pray five times a day, towards Mecca. To be a good Muslim before you die, you have to make a pilgrimage to Mecca." Christians pray all the time, Jews pray all the time, Buddhists follow the basics of karma. Humanists will do no harm to anyone.

There is so much wrong with his preference for Islam. I've never met a Christian who got offended at a person dressing as Muhammad or wanted to debate them, or who told another person, "As-Salamu Alaykum."

His staff can say what they want, but there are only three possibilities: he just got saved, or if he has nothing to hide, why threaten me with contempt and order me to destroy the audio? Or third, he's a Muslim who is backpedaling because he got offended and had a slip of anger, and he knew he couldn't physically attack me!

PG: What do you plan to do now?

Perce: I am going to organize a protest against Judge Martin. I'm going to buy a billboard featuring Martin's photo, saying, "You're outside your bounds of the First Amendment! I'm Mark Martin, I am a Muslim and I'm offended." Victims are not the antagonists. Women do not deserve to be raped because of how they dress. A woman who has been abused doesn't warrant further abuse. I'm angry that an official of a court would say this.

PG: Is there any possibility you could try to press any further criminal or civil charges against the attacker?

Perce: I am not able to file criminal charges against the attacker because of double jeopardy. I am considering a $50 civil suit or asking for a public apology. Martin's decision effectively says that Muslims do not have to learn to accept blasphemy against their religion without violence. Yet when you are a citizen of the USA, you accept our Constitution. Free speech is our foundation.

PG: What do you want people to know?

Perce: I will say to Muslims: "I will not allow you put fear in my mind or [the minds] of those whom I know! I will not be silent. I am an American atheist, and I am not afraid to deal with you openly. While so many others draw Muhammad in private, I am Muhammad in open public!

PG: Are you worried about being attacked or getting death threats?

Perce: I'm more worried that if I stay silent, the energy and emotion within me will be worse to me than being attacked, or even death threats or death itself! So do your worst, and I will do mine! Only my worst is standing up against Islam!

PG: Has the media expressed interest in this story?

Perce: The media has expressed little or no interest. I hope they do, because this judge needs to be out of office.

This is why we must have anti-sharia legislation in America. Equal protection under the law. There is no equal protection or justice for non-Muslims under the sharia. Nor was there for Ernest Perce in Mark Martin's sharia court.

Pamela Geller is the publisher of and the author of the WND Books title Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance.


This story certainly has legs. As you might imagine, the public is only getting the version of the story put out by the “victim” (the atheist). Many, many gross misrepresentations. Among them: I’m a Muslim, and that’s why I dismissed the harassment charge (Fact: if anyone cares, I’m actually Lutheran, and have been for at least 41 years).

I also supposedly called him and threatened to throw him in jail if he released the tapes he had made in the courtroom without my knowledge/permission (Fact: HE called ME and told me that he was ready to “go public” with the tapes and was wondering what the consequences would be; I advised him again to not disseminate the recording, and that I would consider contempt charges; he then replied that he was “willing to go to jail for (his) 1st amendment rights”- I never even uttered the word “jail” in that conversation).

He said that I kept a copy of the Quran on the bench (fact: I keep a Bible on the bench, but out of respect to people with faiths other than Christianity, I DO have a Quran on the bookcase BESIDE my bench, and am trying to acquire a Torah, Book of Mormon, Book of Confucius and any other artifacts which those with a faith might respect).

He claims that I’m biased towards Islam, apparently because he thinks I’m Muslim. In fact, those of you who know me, know that I’m an Army reservist with 27 years of service towards our country (and still serving). I’ve done one tour in Afghanistan, and two tours in Iraq, and am scheduled to return to Afghanistan for a year this summer. During my first tour in Iraq, I was ambushed once, attacked by a mob once, sniped at once, and rocketed, bombed, and mortared so many times that I honestly don’t know how many time I’ve been attacked. Presumably by Muslim insurgents. My point: if anyone SHOULD be biased towards Muslims, one would think it would be me. I’m not, however, because I personally know or have met many good, decent people who follow Islam, and I shouldn’t characterize the actions of those who tried to kill me as characterizations of all Muslims.

When I asked him why he dressed up as “Muhammad zombie,” he told me that it was because he was reflecting the Muslim belief that Muhammad rose from the dead, walked as a zombie, and then went to heaven. That was one of the reasons I tried to spend 6 whole minutes trying to explain and de-mystify Islam through my own knowledge, and in an attempt to prevent an incident like this recurring in my community. Unfortunately, the message was obviously not received in the vein that I had intended. And, in the interest of full disclosure, I did use the word “doofus,” but didn’t call him that directly; I said something akin to “ if you’re going to mock another religion or culture, you should check your facts, first- otherwise, you’ll look like a doofus.”;

In short, I based my decision on the fact that the Commonwealth failed to prove to me beyond a reasonable doubt that the charge was just; I didn’t doubt that an incident occurred, but I was basically presented only with the victim’s version, the defendant’s version, and a very intact Styrofoam sign that the victim was wearing and claimed that the defendant had used to choke him. There so many inconsistencies, that there was no way that I was going to find the defendant guilty.

A lesson learned here: there’s a very good reason for Rule 112 of Rules of Criminal Procedure- if someone makes an unauthorized recording in a Court not of Record, there’s no way to control how it might be manipulated later, and then passed off as the truth. We’ve received dozens upon dozens of phone calls, faxes, and e-mails. There are literally hundreds of not-so-nice posts all over the internet on at least 4 sites that have carried this story, mainly because I’ve been painted as a Muslim judge who didn’t recuse himself, and who’s trying to introduce Sharia law into Mechanicsburg.

UPDATE: Sorry, forgot to add this at first: I don’t think this justifies the judge’s berating of the victim, for the reasons I mentioned in the initial post; but I thought it important to let the judge provide his side of the story.


Monday, February 27, 2012



A supporter of the Human Rights Network group wears a mask of U.S President Barack Obama with a noose around his neck while holding the U.S flag during an anti-American rally in Karachi February 26, 2012. About 20 supporters gathered to protest and condemn the burning of copies of the Koran at NATO's main base in Afghanistan on February 21, 2012. REUTERS/Akhtar Soomro (PAKISTAN - Tags: POLITICS CIVIL UNREST)


Saturday, February 25, 2012



Ronbo says this white trash slut and her degenerate Leftist family needs to be hauled before judge and jury as enemies of the American People.

As a result of a Judicial Watch filing under the Freedom of Information Act, the USAF released documents detailing House Speaker Pelosi's use of United States Air Force aircraft between March 2009 and June 2010. The data are published in the Judicial Watch Verdict of December 2010, Volume 16, Issue 12.

Here are the main highlights revealed by the USAF. Keep in mind that all the data below relate to United States Air Force aircraft used by one woman over a sixteen month period.

Several of these flights included Ms Pelosi's guests such as grown children, grandchildren, various in-laws, friends, and hangers-on. Over 95% of the trips were between the west coast and Washington , DC or what we might call a commute between home and the office. READ it and WEEP!!

Total trips: 85 trips over a 68 week period or 1.25 average trips per week.
Total mileage: 206,264 miles or 2,427 average miles per trip
Total flying time: 428.6 hours or an average of 5 hrs per trip
Cost to the taxpayers: $2,100,744.59 or $27,715.00 per trip or $1,285,162.00 per year
Cost of in flight food and alcohol: $101,429.14 or $1,193.00 per trip or $62,051.00 per year.

On one junket to Baghdad, according to the Air Force report, she had the aircraft bar stocked with Johnny Walker Red Scotch, Grey Goose Vodka, E&J Brandy, Bailey's Irish Creme, Maker's Mark Whiskey, Courvoisier Cognac, Bacardi Rum, Jim Beam Whiskey, Beefeater Gin, Dewars Scotch, Bombay Sapphire Gin, Jack Daniels Whiskey, Corona Beer and several varieties of wine. This was obviously a very important "gubment bidness" trip.

Evidence generally speaks for itself, and in Ms. Pelosi's case it speaks the language of abuse and (evidently) a serious familial drinking problem, for in a single year she and her spawn drank an amount in excess of the net income of the average employed American! When she said, "... If the stimulus doesn't pass, five hundred million people might lose their jobs...", I thought she was unintentionally revealing her ignorance. I'm now more inclined to think she was pickled.

Even though she can no longer abuse the USAF, she can either fly on her broom, or fly Southwest Airlines, wherebags fly free.

If you are an AMERICAN citizen it is YOUR DUTY to PASS THIS ON!!

Friday, February 24, 2012


Obama Has Already Lost, and He Doesn't Even Know It

Barack Obama is a lame-duck president already, but he probably doesn't realize it since he is surrounded by leftist zealots who insulate him from any contrary opinions and shielded by the partisan mainstream media. Obama's popularity began falling right after his election, and the percentage disapproving has exceeded those approving steadily since 2009. Each and every voting bloc that supported him in 2008 has eroded by at least 10 points -- even the African-American voters, with independents and young voters dropping by over 30 points. Approval on major issues (economy, budget, deficit, employment, etc.) has also eroded, with disapproval exceeding approval ratings across the board.

Despite approval ratings lower than any president's in recent history, the media push-polls are trying to sell us the idea that Obama is well liked and has a good chance to be re-elected, meanwhile ignoring any and all facts that do not support their partisan message. The good news is that there has been a mass awakening of the American people, who now realize that the mainstream media has a decided leftist tilt and that media polls can no longer be trusted.

Meanwhile, Democrats want us to believe that Obama has been a tremendous success. He promised to redistribute our wealth, and he has begun. He promised to transform our health care system, and he passed ObamaCare. He promised that his energy policies would dramatically increase energy costs, and they have. He promised to appoint justices who think like he does to the Supreme Court, and he has. He promised to pull American troops out of Iraq, regardless of the situation on the ground, and he has. He made many promises that he is trying to keep, but we just didn't listen closely enough or didn't believe that he meant what he said. Now that American voters have finally woken up, their opinion is that they don't like the country's new direction and would like to repeal much of what Obama has done!

There's been a running debate about whether we're in a genuine economic recovery and how strong the recovery is. At the two-year mark, when every other postwar recession had been over or nearly over, this one is just now bottoming out. In other efforts to improve the economy, Obama has nationalized two car companies and exerted unprecedented control over financial institutions with continued fear over the nationalization of banks, and he is in the midst of nationalizing medicine and education. The administration is proud to have manipulated the unemployment rate to show progress, but Obama's people have all the while ignored that millions have given up hope and dropped out completely from the employment market.

Obama, meanwhile, has been depending on the economy to makes its normal, natural V-shaped recovery, while doing everything he can to undermine and suppress that recovery. The economic crisis was caused, in large part, by excessive debt, so a big part of the solution should be to increase savings and pay down debt, creating the financial reserves to support a new expansion. Instead, Obama and congressional Democrats rapidly increased government debt with the giant "stimulus" bill, which wasted the better part of a trillion dollars. The United States' credit rating has been downgraded for the first time in history. The political/economic issue that defines the Obama recovery is the fact that the federal government now operates without a budget. Without a budget, every major decision on federal spending, debt, and taxes has to be fought all over again in the political arena every few months, creating pervasive uncertainty. The current leadership, with President Obama first and foremost, is doing everything it can to create uncertainty on all of these issues.

The president knows he is in trouble, so he has given up leading the country and is now focused solely on campaigning for re-election. Obama has little chance of winning in November, but this does not stop the mainstream media from selling the message that he has a chance. Fortunately for them, many voters are uninformed and can still be influenced by the constant media spin.

David Coughlin is a political pundit, editor of the policy action-planning website "Return to Common Sense," and an active member of the White Plains Tea Party. He was educated at West Point (Bachelor of Science, 1971) and the University of Alabama in Huntsville (Masters, Administrative Science, 1976).

Thursday, February 23, 2012



Meanwhile, the Muslim barbarians in Afghanistan continue to do what they have always done for the last 1,400 years, which is to murder anyone not on the same page as their psychopath Prophet, The Big Mo.

Taliban to Afghans: Kill foreigners over Koran burnings...

Afghans burn effigy of 'Black Dog' Obama...


Just to show a few statistics illustrating what those in the industry call ”the Obama effect:”

Ruger’s firearm sales have gone from $117 million to $232 million, an increase of 98%

Winchester’s sales of ammunition have gone from $431.7 million to $572 million, an increase of 33%

Federal excise taxes collected on the sale of new firearms and ammunition has risen 48.3%

January 2012 was the 20th straight month of increases in NICS background checks compared to the same month in the previous year

December 2011 saw over 1.41 million NICS background checks run, the most ever for a single month

The few states which regularly report concealed carry permit numbers have seen increases in active permit holders ranging from 46% to 161%


Wednesday, February 22, 2012



"If the American Left didn't have double standards, they wouldn't have any standards at all" --Sarah Palin


Freedom of Speech a Fantasy in America

A Commentary by J. D. Longstreet

We have known for some time that the government was listening to our phone calls, landlines and cell phones, and we have suspected they were doing the same thing to our e-mail and to our blogs. Now we KNOW.

“A privacy advocacy group has swayed Congress to hold a hearing next week into the Department of Homeland Security’s practice of monitoring social networks such as Twitter and Facebook, as well as media reports and organizations, including The Drudge Report.” (SOURCE)

How much longer will Americans allow our freedom to be eroded … taken away? How long are we going to allow the desecration of the US Constitution?

Since September 11th, 2001 we have been trading our freedom for security. It never works. The end result has always been that a people who trade freedom for security eventually wind up with neither.
The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) recently obtained close to 300 pages of documents, as a result of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, detailing the federal agency’s “intelligence gathering” practices on the web.

Among the documents were guidelines from DHS instructing outside contractors to monitor the web for media reports and comments that “reflect adversely” on the agency or the federal government.

As Reuters reported last month, in early 2010 contractors were asked to spend 24 hours monitoring news media coverage on popular websites, including Facebook, Twitter, Hulu, WikiLeaks, as well as news sites including the Huffington Post and The Drudge Report.

The documents obtained by EPIC indicate that following the exercise, a procurement official awarded an $11.3 million contract to General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems in order to carry out the monitoring on a “24/7/365 basis”.” (SOURCE)

What has happened to America’s guarantee that its citizens have “freedom of speech?” Has that guarantee been revoked? Indeed, it has.

Look. America has a government run amok. Like a giant vacuum cleaner, Washington is sucking our freedom up and leaving us vulnerable to a tyrannical central government with a socialist agenda.

The Bill of Rights, the leash our founders placed around the neck of government in America has been slipped and like a ravenous junkyard dog, that government is devouring the liberty and freedom of all Americans.

The Obama Regime has been the worst violator of the government restraints placed on them by the constitution since the Lincoln Administration.

The corruption within the current government is as bad, or worse, than that of the Grant Administration. Government -- and the power of government -- has grown exponentially under Obama’s leadership -- and he is asking for another term to complete the job.

Consider this: As we observe the degradation of American liberty under the Obama Regime’s first term, what do you think will happen when Obama is not restrained by an impending election? Can America survive as a free constitutional representative republic with a capitalist society? In my opinion, the answer is an emphatic, resounding NO! America cannot survive. At least a FREE America cannot survive.

America is facing the very real threat of becoming another socialist dung heap where all its citizens suffer “fairly” or, as the socialists and Marxists say, … equally.

Ginger McCall, the Director of EPIC is reported to have said: “The idea that the government is constantly peering over your shoulder and listening to what you are saying creates a very chilling effect to legitimate dissent.” (SOURCE)

I agree with Ms. McCall, except that I would take it a step farther. Not only does government eavesdropping chill freedom of speechit THROTTLES it!

This whole mess is just another indication of how America has slipped into the Post Constitution era. The “fabled” US Constitution is a thing of the past. It is a myth born in the dim mists of yesteryear and is no longer applicable today.

Just as history records that Nero burned Rome, history must record that Obama presided over the destruction of America.

Look. A nation like America can only be successful if it has a God-fearing populace, not a people who celebrate infanticide and behavior that God has proclaimed an abomination. America is more like the latter than the former today. As a result, we have sold ourselves into slavery.

The distant bell we hear is tolling America’s death knell. The last best hope of mankind is breathing it’s last, felled by it’s own hand.

J. D. Longstreet

Labels: , , , , , , ,


Elections in America: 'Inaccurate, Costly, and Inefficient'

Jon N. Hall

America's voter registries are a mess, according to "Inaccurate, Costly, and Inefficient," a new report from The Pew Center on the States. The 11-page report asserts:

  • Approximately 24 million -- one of every eight -- active voter registrations in the United States are no longer valid or are significantly inaccurate.
  • More than 1.8 million deceased individuals are listed as active voters.
  • Approximately 2.75 million people have active registrations in more than one state.

If Pew's data are correct, how can Americans have any faith in their elections? Well, they can't. But before you get too depressed about America having become a banana republic, consider the source of Pew's data. Dave Urbanski at The Blaze reports:

Pew's voter-registration summaries are based on numbers from Catalist, a data-crunching organization that heralds itself as "serving the progressive community" (i.e., the political far left). [...] And in case you're wondering if the Pew Center on the States' brief disclosed any of Catalist's leftward political leanings, that'd be a "no." But given that the sole donor listed under the Pew Center on the States' political initiatives is George Soros' Open Society Institute, that might explain a few things, too.

Despite the political leanings at Pew, it's safe to say that America's voter registries are indeed rife with error. But does Pew have a solution? A 2011 Pew report, "Upgrading Democracy," "examines how technology can be used to improve voter registration." We read on page 2 of their 34-page report that their "approach" is comprised of "three core elements," the first of which is this:

Compare voter registration lists with a wider array of data sources to broaden the base of information used to update and verify voter rolls.

Unfortunately, this approach misses the mark. Indeed, it will produce results which are "inaccurate, costly, and inefficient."

Pew's solution to the problem of unreliable voter registries is to create "a common data exchange controlled by the states" where multiple data sources can be matched and cross-checked. It is similar to "universal voter registration", and shares the same weaknesses. And, by Pew's own estimate, their method is not error-free and will not register all citizens.

Pew's method rests on the idea that the information needed to correctly register all American citizens is not readily available. Rather than "broaden the base of information," we need to narrow it. You don't go after "a wider array of data sources" if there is a single definitive source. Pew has taken exactly the wrong approach.

Pew's approach is to fix existing voter registries. What we should do is replace those registries, which is what "automatic registration" does. (To find out about that better solution to the problem, read this article and then click on the links at the bottom.)

As errant as registration is, our systems for conducting elections and counting votes are just as screwy. So it's sad that Attorney General Holder thinks he must challenge photo ID requirements in Texas and South Carolina. Yet, Wendy Underhill of National Conference of State Legislatures reports: "A big majority of Americans favor voter ID requirements."

In the absence of any substantive reform implemented before the November election, here's a stopgap measure that the states could use to improve the integrity of their elections regardless of whether they have photo ID laws or not: Require that voters submit their Social Security Numbers to vote.

This measure would require that the SSN be affixed to every absentee, provisional, early, and mail-in ballot. And at every voting station on Election Day, the voter would submit his SSN. But the voter wouldn't need to take his social security card to his voting station, as most folks have their SSNs permanently etched in their brains. So to placate the Eric Holders of this world, this new requirement doesn't necessitate the acquisition of a new ID.

What's also needed is for citizens to monitor voting stations -- it's time for the Tea Party to saddle up and follow Catherine Engelbrecht of True the Vote. Catherine delivered a terrific speech (video) at the most recent Restoration Weekend of the David Horowitz Freedom Center, with John Fund making powerful points in his introductory remarks.

Stopgap measures and citizen monitors are only suggested because no one really wants to fix our voter registration problem. Organizations like Pew don't want to once-and-for-all fix the problem because then they'd be out of work. Career politicians don't want to fix the problem because with the current election systems, vote counts can be manipulated, ballots can be belatedly discovered in back rooms or in the trunks of cars. With the current systems, party apparatchiks can ensure that the right people win.

Winston Churchill once observed that Americans will always do the right thing, but only after they've exhausted all the alternatives. But Churchill's bromide breaks down when it comes to our election systems, where so-called "experts" all stand around debating about how many teeth horses have when there's a perfectly docile nag at hand for them to examine. Our "experts" will do anything but look into the horse's mouth.

But here in The Banana Republic of North America we don't worry about efficiency, cost and accuracy in our elections:

Come, Mister Tally Man, tally me banana

(Daylight come and me wan' go home) ...

A beautiful bunch o' ripe banana

(Daylight come and me wan' go home)

Jon N. Hall is a programmer/analyst from Kansas City.

Tuesday, February 21, 2012


Search 18 U.S.C. § 2381 : US Code - Section 2381: Treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

From Obama, What Next?

By Warren Beatty

We have witnessed President Barack Obama, and his administration, issue edicts, work against and/or ignore the US Constitution and Congress, and be inconsistent when it suits him. The question now becomes, "What will Obama do next?"

In August, 2011, Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius issued a proposed regulation that would force all health care plans to cover sterilizations and contraceptives, including those that cause abortion. On January 20, 2012, Sebelius announced that the final regulation would take effect for individuals and business owners on August 1, 2012, and for Catholic hospitals, universities and charities on August 1, 2013.

Also, because Obamacare mandates that all Americans must purchase health insurance, the HHS regulation will require Catholics to act against the teachings of their faith. Obama is attacking the First Amendment right to the free exercise of religion. To try to ease the outcry the HHS announcement caused, Obama, on Friday, February 10, 2012, he proposed a "solution," an "accommodation."

So since Obama and his administration think they can ignore the US Constitution, particularly the first amendment, and mandate that Catholics go against their faith, the question now is, "What next?"

Let's turn our attention to the Second Amendment. Obama's most lasting impact on gun control is through the appointment of Sonya Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, both gun control advocates, to the Supreme Court. While paying lip service to the second amendment, he told Sarah Brady, "I just want you to know that we are working on [gun control]. We have to go through a few processes, but under the radar." What good will the second amendment be if/when all guns have been "controlled" out of existence?

As for the rest of the Bill of Rights (amendments 3 - 10), the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) took care of that. The NDAA is an act that grants the US military the "legal" right to conduct secret kidnappings of US citizens, followed by indefinite detention, interrogation, torture, and even murder, and Obama signed it into law.

With his "We can't wait" campaign, Obama has declared that he will ignore the US Constitution and Congress when they don't let him have his way. In December, 2011, Obama appointed Richard Cordray to direct the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Also in December, 2011, he appointed three members to the National Labor Relations Board. They were all "recess appointments." The only problem was that Congress had not recessed. This attempt to circumvent the legislative branch is a violation of Obama's oath of office to uphold and defend the US Constitution.

On December 17, 2011, the Senate agreed to, as it can as outlined in Article I, Section 5 of the US Constitution, an order instituting "pro forma" sessions. President Obama now claims that the Senate was actually recessed. But on December 23, 2011, President Obama signed a two-month extension of the payroll tax cut. If the Senate was actually on recess, as Obama claimed, that day, it couldn't have passed the bill, and Obama couldn't have signed it into law. Ever inconsistent and looking for situations to get his own way, Obama did not respect the Senate's own view as to whether it was in session or not.

In a radio interview on November 6, 2011, Obama said that if Congress is not willing to pass legislation he wants, he will do it himself in order to win another term.

We now have a clear picture of Obama's behavior. With that picture in mind, we can now ask the question, "What will he do next?" Obama ignores the US Constitution and Congress when it suits his purposes. He issues edicts without regard to the US Constitution. He signs into law unconstitutional acts. He is blatantly inconsistent.

Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) said, "If that [ObamaCare] is held constitutional -- for them [Obama and his administration] to be able to tell us we have to purchase health insurance -- then there is literally nothing that the federal government can't force us to do. Nothing."

So again, I ask the question, "What next?" What other edicts/mandates/surprises await us? Since the government is the major shareholder in General Motors, is he, in an effort to reach his goal of having 1 million electric cars on US highways by 2015, going next to tell us that we must purchase Chevy Volts? Is a declaration of martial law coming? Is he going to try to suspend ALL civil rights? Is he going to suspend elections and have himself declared king?

Martin Niemoller, a decorated U-boat captain in World War I, became a minister of religion and an opponent of the Nazis in the 1930s. He said:

"When the Nazis came for the communists, I said nothing; I was, of course, no communist.
When they locked up the Social Democrats, I said nothing; I was, of course, no Social Democrat.
When they came for the trade unionists, I said nothing; I was, of course, no trade unionist.
When they came for me, there was no one left who could protest."

Was he prophetic?

Dr. Beatty earned a Ph.D. in Quantitative Management and Statistics from Florida State University. He was a (very conservative) professor of quantitative management specializing in using statistics to assist/support decision making. He has been a consultant to many small businesses and is now retired. Dr. Beatty is a veteran who served in the US Army for 22 years. He blogs at:

Monday, February 20, 2012


Jenny Durkan - "A MAN'S MAN!" - Barack Obama (2009)

The famous picture of harmless Shakespearean actor John Wilkes Booth and Confederate hero that Jenny Durkan finds offensive for some perverted Yankee reason.

In Chapter Two, “I'm Sleepless In Seattle Because of Ronbo” - the Grand & Glorious U.S. Attorney for Western Washington State falls into fury after reading this funny polemic-satire, which dares tell the truth about her Highness in crude street language.

After foaming at the mouth and chewing the carpet for a good half hour, Darling Jenny pick up the red phone on her desk and calls the Director of Homeland Security – a fellow bitch – who picks up her red phone and calls her bitch, the Director of the United States Secret Service (allegedly of the male sex, although many Patriots have their doubts) giving him orders to do strange sexual things to Ronbo, who happens to be sleeping well in Seattle, “until he gets his mind right.”

(The Fearless Leader of the Dread SS rolls his eyes while looking at a picture of Ronbo taped to the wall on which he has drawn devil horns and a tail.)

“Boss, much as I hate the guy, there is nothing I can do to Ronbo at the moment without an Presidential Executive Finding For Assassination. As it stands today, the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution gives him the right to say anything about a public person, which covers Jenny Durkan, as long as he makes no threats.”

“Have I read his article? Yes, I did. It was kind of humorous in gross way. I'm glad Ronbo is making fun of other public figures besides myself and President Obama. It shows his development as a writer. I think the guy has talent as an author of polemics and satire...”

“Boss, I wish you'd cut out the adult language. This line is tapped by the National Security Agency at Ft. Meade, Maryland. We don't want this conversation outed on Wikileaks, you know!”

“What? No way I can arrest the NSA for wire tapping! This is what those people do. I understand their motto is “In God We Trust. All Others We Tape,” heck they even record President Obama. We are in very good company. We are important enough to be taped and watched. “

(The Director takes another pain pill and starts to feel better, especially when he looks at the calender next to the picture of Ronbo with the days marked off until his retirement.)

“What can I do to Ronbo? Not much I'm afraid. Yes, I know he's a Class III suspect – a clear and present danger to the Ruling Class – but it gets back to that old Constitutional thing called freedom of speech....”

“Yes, I know President Obama and the Attorney General have their copies for toilet paper, but I'm pretty sure the House of Representatives and the Tea Party Movement have copies. I know Ronbo carries a dog eared copy of it in his left shirt pocket over his heart. So I guess the cows are out of the barn on that idea and it will do us no good to shut the barn door.”

Harmless, poor, old, disabled and depressed Ronbo who was very unhappy at climbing only one mountain somewhere way out West in the summer of our discontent.

“Burn the original? I thought of that, but it's pretty well guarded and those security people can shoot! I'm afraid for now we have to play by the rules for the time being.”

(The Director takes his second pain pill of the day and the world is really looking much, much better!)

Assassinate Ronbo? We tried that several times. The man lives a charmed life! On the last attempt we missed Ronbo, but we almost killed a dozen innocent civilians in Florida.

What? This is a long story. He wrote an article about it on his blog that pretty much tells the tale. I'll send you the link.”

“Have the FCC shut down, Blogger to put Ronbo's blog out of business. We can't do that Boss! The Republicans control the House, and would surely cut off the FCC funding and our money as well....”

“Yes, they can do that too! The U.S. Constitution states...”

“Boss you really have to watch what you say, as some people would think what you just said is treason..not to mention solicitation for murder based what you said earlier. I'm of the mind you are just harmlessly venting because you hate Ronbo, however, a Special Attorney like Ken Starr may look at this conversation in different light and...”

“Once again, Boss, treason and/or murder solicitation conviction can end badly for the offender.”

“We both go down together? I think not. For one thing I'll do a deal with the Special Attorney and roll over on you, bitch. And I have another ace to play. This is how the law enforcement game is played. When they catch you, you do a deal and roll over on someone one step higher, which in my case will be you. I should inform you that you stand high on the Patriot Proscription List. If an ambitious Special Attorney wants to get in good with them and agree to give testimony against you in court, I'm In Like Flint with the Tea Party Movement and the Republicans.”

(The line goes dead. The Director takes a third pain pill and feels himself smile. He goes to the bathroom just off his office and looks into the mirror. “Damn what a shit eating grin! With a little make up I'd look like Jack Nicholson in that Batman movie,” he thinks. He returns to his desk and picks up the red phone and speaks to the still silent Boss.)

“The only thing I can do to Ronbo is send one of our SS agents in Seattle to ask him politely to stop publishing polemical satire against the Ruling Class...”

“Tell him to take down that picture of John Wilkes Booth on his blog, because it gives you the willies?..”

“I'll ASK the agent to ASK him to take the picture down, but I understand Ronbo likes Booth because he was a great American Shakespearean actor who well played Brutus in his day....”

“Can my agent just shoot Ronbo? Sure could, he's armed with a .357 magnum, however, they meet every Thursday morning at Starbucks in downtown Seattle. Do you have any idea how many people are at Starbucks on any weekday? We are talking all seats filled and a line out the door! My agent would be killing him in front of a room full of upper middle class intelligent white people armed with video cams on their cell phones. This is not to mention the store cameras. Also, Congressmen would wonder why the SS is the assassination business instead putting the assassination business out of business. Why in no time all the SS would be arrested and sent for life to Shemya, Alaska. This is in the Aleutian Islands about 1,500 miles northwest from Anchorage. The worst weather is the world...tundra! I say give the Ronbo Contract to the FBI, but there is no way on God's Green Earth will my SS will murder an innocent man at Starbucks...”

I have complete confidence in the Director, United States Secret Service, because, like me, he's Irish. 'As is well known in Chicago, an Irish cop is the best policemen money can buy. - Barack Obama (2011)

(The Director hears a click. He thinks of taking a fourth pain pill, but passes on the idea because he is clearly NOT feeling any pain....Horny, yes...but NO PAIN! He finally reads the prescription label. The Latin for the drug he can't pronounce, but the “habit forming” part he understands. The Director pulls out his cell phone and punches a number.)

“G-Man? Still in Seattle? Yes, I know you hate the weather...and it's always rainy, chilly and overcast! It is the Pacific Northwest, you know. When will Ronbo go back to Florida? How should I know? Ask him yourself? Yes, I know you'd rather have a tooth pulled without a pain pill than talk to Ronbo! No, for the one thousandth time you can't shoot him!!! Congress would wonder. We have been down the road before G-Man! It's not like I'm telling you to take a bullet for the president, DUH! Just talk to the old man, after all Ronbo is 63 years and disabled. You're what? Thirty-five years old in fighting trim well armed with a .357 with a license to kill just like James Bond.”

“No, we don't need another agent in American Samoa. We only send agents who hate the tropics to the tropics. Why? Our studies have proven that if SS agents hate where we station them, they tend to be very unhappy, but very alert and hating their superiors in Washington, D.C., where they will never be stationed. ...'Field agents always stay way out in left field' is the SS motto.”

“Suicide? This would be a bit extreme even for a highly emotional person like you, G-Man! I don't believe you, especially after I sent you that short timer's calendar with all the pay and benefits you get after 25 years in the SS posted at the bottom. Why, son, the health plan alone is pure 100% gold! Just hang in there for another short fifteen years, and The Very Generous Fully Funded Eternal SS Retirement Package will pay enough to buy a small South Pacific island in less than a year.”

“Now picture this: You're a young 50 something retired secret agent man owning your own small island and tribe somewhere in the South Pacific. Yes, you are the king of paradise! Of course, you are a good king who only offers up one human sacrifice a year to to keep the volcano god happy. You may be a just, generous and goodly king, but you're also a smart king who has read his Machiavelli and knows the value of fear. Then one sunny perfect day in paradise your security guards shove an old man in front of your throne who has survived a ocean plane crash before you for judgement, as your Highness has forbidden visitors from the outside world except for Playboy Bunnies, Sports' Illustrated Models and Michelle Obama. The old man from the sea looks...familiar....could it be? TOM HANKS??? (What movie was that? The one where he played the airplane survivor Fedex guy on a desert island somewhere in the vast South Pacific?) No! It's OLD RONBO!!! The volcano god will be appeased early this year.”

“Okay, Okay, OKAY, G-Man!!! You drive a hard bargain. The GS-16 promotion is totally out of the question, but the GS-13, Step 20 is doable. It will give you the same perks and pay as GS-16 without the command authority. You really don't want the command authority, take it from me.”

“Agreed? You will talk to Ronbo tomorrow at 0800 sharp at Starbucks in beautiful downtown Seattle even if rains and makes you depressed? You will ask him humbly to remove the picture of John Wilkes Booth from his blog and stop doing articles about Jenny Durkan? She can't help being queer - she was born that way."

What else? Back up? How many? No problem, but they buy their own coffee and drinks! I'm still getting hell from American Express because those SS agents in Moscow used my credit card number to buy themselves and their dates all the high end drinks served at the Red Square Starbucks. Very funny! They said it was their revenge for me cutting back on their overtime pay! Ha-Ha! 'We got ya, Boss!' they said. Can you imagine the bill? You know the price of coffee at any Starbucks! But at THE MOSCOW STARBUCKS! Moscow is the most expensive city in world, and you have to pay the balance on the American Express Gold Card in full every month, or get downsized to American Express Green. I had to sell my wife's BMW to pay that bill, and would you believe she is still mad at me? Women: what man can understand them! I mean she needed to lose some weight and she is because she has to walk everywhere now."

“So pass it on to your fellow agents – BUY YOUR OWN DAMN COFFEE AT STARBUCKS!!!”

Meanwhile deep in belly of the Top Secret National Security Agency (NSA) beast complex the not-so-Top Secret SS conversations have been recorded, analyzed, and made a transcript. A briefing is held the next morning for the Supreme Defense Council (*SDC) that meets weekly at the NSA.

Of course, the "law" (The law that no longer exists since Obama has used the U.S. Constitution for toilet paper) clearly states the NSA cannot tape the conversations of American citizens. This is especially true for the U.S. Secret Service, FBI and Homeland Security. HOWEVER, the Director of the NSA, a high ranking military officer and fan of Napoleon Bonaparte and Julius Caesar plans a military putsch May, 2012. These intercepted Top Secret SS conversations will play well on Fox News as an alibi for the coup.

*The SDC was created in 2009 by President Obama who signed off on it in a hurry (He was late to a golf game with a big fund raiser at Walt Disney World in Orlando) on what he believed to be an executive order giving his unelected czars and major union bosses a hefty pay raise with numerous perks. Well, the first page did actually say something like that in very large print, so Obama skipped back to the signature page and put his "John Henry" on the 1,000 page "Presidential Finding" that set the SDC to coordinate the overthrow of the Republic in May, 2012 that would result in his trial and execution by a "Provisional Revolutionary Government" allowed to hold office for ten years after 2012 without election and the appointment of a "First Citizen" (The Director of the NSA) with dictatorial powers to guide the nation back to democracy under a Second Republic.