Saturday, August 31, 2013

OBAMA DEAD OF A HEART ATTACK


Barack Obama has a heart attack and dies. He goes to hell, where the Devil is waiting for him.


"I'm not sure what to do." says the Devil. "You're on my list, but I have no room for you. As you definitely have to stay here, I'm going to have to let someone else go."




"I've got three folks here who weren't quite as bad as you. I'll let one of them go, but you have to take their place. I'll even let you decide who leaves!"



Obama thought that sounded pretty good, so he agrees. The Devil opened the first room. In it was Nancy Pelosi and a large pool of hot water. she kept diving in and climbing out, over and over. Such was her fate in hell.



"No!' said Obama. 'I don't think so, I'm not a good swimmer!" The Devil led him to the next room. In it was Harry Reid with a sledgehammer and a room full of rocks. All he did was swing the hammer, time after time.



"No! I've got this problem with my shoulder. I would be in constant agony if all I had to do was break rocks all day."


The Devil opened the third door. In it, Obama saw Bill Clinton lying on the floor with his arms staked over his head, and his legs staked in a spread-eagle pose. Bent over him was Monica Lewinsky, doing what she does best.


Obama looked at this in disbelief for a while, and finally says, "Yeah, I can handle this." The Devil smiled and said, "OK, Monica, you're free to Go!"

The ILLEGAL ALIEN IN CHIEF allows the Muslim Brotherhood to KILL CHRISTIANS in Syria, and take over another country.


It really is a "more progressive, blood lust".

Little do they know that they are fulfilling what our Heavenly Father said would happen.


Yet they are seeing the Greater Exodus happening before our eyes,
and most either are too involved in their "day-to-day lives", or they just don't want to see, that what God SAID would happen ... IS happening now.

 
Hussein of America is INTENTIONALLY DESTROYING AMERICA, from the inside out.






The Muslims are guilty of the chemical attack, not the Christians, and the ILLEGAL ALIEN IN CHIEF knows it.


But the ARAB-KENYANand MUSLIM defiling the Oval Office doesn't care.


Barack Hussein Obama II, (a.k.a. Barry Soetoro) just want to turn Syria into another Muslim Brotherhood run country, and kill Christians.


It's just that simple!

Believing His Own BS: A Commentary by J. D. Longstreet


***********************
Oh, this is embarrassing! Our wimp of a President trying to fit into the hat of the Commander-in-Chief.  Geez!  He could at least take the "Kick Me" sign off his back.
Look.  This is what you get when you put a guy in an office for which he is not suited, not ready for, and does not have the cahones to make hard decisions.  And believe me, Mr. Obama is decision averse!  He hates making decisions of any kind but he hates hard decisions the most dragging his feet hoping he can outlast the problem, run out the clock, and not have to make a decision at all.
I've known other people just like that.  It strikes me that the people who delay making decisions are the very same people who condemn the final decision maker if the slightest thing goes wrong. 
See,  here's where I am having an immense problem with Obama's feckless behavior.  Our national honor is now at stake and he, Obama, has caused it to be called into question and that just stinks!
We have this expression down south that covers situations like this.  It is something like this:  "It's is really bad to run a man down and THEN HAVE YOUR BUTT WHIPPED!"
Mr. Obama's mouth has written a check his butt cannot cash!  The man is folding like a wilted suit before the gaze of -- NO -- not Assad!  Putin!
Anyone running their mouths as often as our motor-mouth President must be prepared to stick his foot in it fairly often.  Occasionally, he may step so deeply into it, that he must be willing to fight to back up his spoken rhetoric.  If he isn't willing to go all out to preserve his honor, and the honor of those he represents, well then, he isn't much of a man.
The thing is this:  You cannot take a nation like the US to the brink of war with threats unless you are willing to carry through.  Apparently Obama, as is his wont, believed his own BS.  He apparently believed that his just uttering the words would so fill the hearts of the enemy with fear and dread that they would shut-up and slink away with their collective tails between their legs.
Didn't happen.
Those of us who live out here in the real world never thought it would and said so publicly. All he has accomplished is to make America look like a paper tiger -- a reflection, perhaps, of its leader.
Oh, and he has emboldened our enemies the world over.   By his feckless action, or lack there of, he has made the situation exponentially worse.
Whereas, a few days ago, a pinprick, surgical, strike might actually have served a purpose, done some good,  (The operative word in the preceding sentence is "MIGHT.") now, however, a pinprick, surgical, strike will do absolutely nothing besides provide a propaganda victory to the enemy.
Now, the US Forces must make a major strike, seriously damaging the command and control centers of Assad's government, his airfields, his harbor(s), his transportaion modes, his communications, take out his air forces, his navy -- in other words,  we have to throw that ole "shock and awe" at Assad, or -- do nothing at all.
Oh, dear reader, how many times have we reminded America that liberal's have no understanding of military force nor its application.  You are seeing it play out right before your eyes today.  No matter how this Syrian adventure of Mr. Obama's plays out, it will not be good for the US.
Normally, I would say that calling off the attack would do the US less harm than if we carry through with a strike so surgical as to be perceived as a face-saving slap on the wrist.  Not now.
Our national honor has been laid upon the alter of Obama's over inflated vanity by his words, vacuous words that demonstrated a distinct lack of intelligence or thought; that were, in fact, stupid and even silly  It is a sacrifice we cannot afford to make.  No nation can.
Obama made this bed, now America must lie upon it.
Personally, I didn't want this war.  I can find no definable US interest in Syria. Frankly, it appears (to me) to be more of a "micturition contest" between Obama and Putin than anything else.
Obama has brought us to the stage at which anything less than a full scale attack will be interpreted by the remainder of the world as turning tail and running. Sorry, folks, but that's the way it is.
As a conservative commentator has said so many times:  "Words mean things."   A President has a responsibility to measure his every utterance.
Someone once said: "A man is never so empty as when he is full of himself."  I am very much afraid we have a Commander-in-Chief who has suddenly found himself backed into a corner by his own rhetoric.   Unfortunately, he has forced the country into the same corner with him and that is unacceptable in the extreme.
© J D. Longstreet
*********************
VISIT J. D. Longstreet's "INSIGHT on Freedom" Face Book Page!!:   (Just click on the link for more conservative commentary by J. D. Longstreet and other popular conservative writers!) *************************************************

Obama Loses the Name of Action In Syria



———

And thus the native hue of resolution
Is sicklied o'er, with the pale cast of thought,
And enterprises of great pitch and moment,
With this regard their currents turn awry,
And lose the name of action.
So speaks Hamlet, describing the curse of his own paralyzing indecisiveness, at the conclusion of Shakespeare's most famous soliloquy. These are the lines that have been going through my head over the past week as I have watched President Obama agonize over the big question about Syria: to bomb or not to bomb?

It has been a process of watching the shrinking of the proposed mission, from merely inadequate to a pinprick, the delay of its beginning from this last Thursday to maybe never, and the shrinking of support from all corners, even our most reliable ally.

Then President Obama popped up in a press conference on Friday to tell us that he has not yet made a decision on Syria. Yeah, we noticed.

The reason it's taking the president so long to decide is that Obama is boxed in by the consequences of his previous indecision. He chose not to intervene early on, when indirect support—weapons and training—might have been enough, and before the rebellion against Assad had become a magnet for Islamists and a means for rebuilding al-Qaeda. That's why I sympathize with Michael Totten, who laments: "I've wanted to watch Syria's Bashar al-Assad get his clock cleaned for eight years, so it feels rather strange that I'm a bit ambivalent all of a sudden now that it looks like the United States might actually take action against him."

Then a few months ago, when Assad first crossed the "red line" of using chemical weapons, the administration hemmed and hawed about the evidence, failed to follow up, and promised to supply weapons to the rebels, which either never showed up or didn't make much difference on the battlefield.

By these steps, the administration's policy in Syria has lost the name of action.

Obama is boxed in by a basic contradiction. He wants to be President of the United States, responsible for big decisions and for bearing the global responsibilities that this country faces whether we seek them out or not. At the same time, the essence of his policy has been to divest America of any such global responsibility, to make us just one nation among others and not a dominant force, to "lead from behind" and to never be out in front.

This is the tension between two strains of the left, the humanitarian strain that wants to prevent genocide and mass slaughter and maintain "international norms" against chemical weapons, versus the anti-interventionist strain that views any American action as overbearing imperialism.

Hence the Hamlet act. But when the President of the United States is himself ambivalent, half-hearted, and indecisive, how can he rally anyone else to his cause? Hence the vote in the House of Commons. The message from Britain is: if you don't believe in your cause, why should we? If you haven't made a decision, why should we stick our necks out?

The result is a policy that is doing what might have seemed impossible: making George W. Bush look good by comparison. As Bryan Preston wryly notes:
"Kerry said that the Syria strike will not resemble Iraq or Afghanistan, and he's obviously right: Unlike those previous wars, the Syria strike will not have public approval, congressional approval, UN approval, a coalition of nations fighting alongside us, and a clear military objective."
Saw what you will about George Bush. "The decider" was no Hamlet.
———

Friday, August 30, 2013

OBAMA MADE TO LOOK LIKE A RODEO CIRCUS CLOWN BY FRIENDS AND ENEMIES




UK: NO WAR...
Cameron first to lose war vote in Parliament since 1782!
Shadow of False Iraq Intelligence Lingers...
Obama willing to go solo...
Risks International Law Conflict...
Deploys fifth warship...
Playing into Moscow's hands...
SYRIA MOVES MISSILES, TROOPS...
POLL: 80% think Congress should decide...
Attack aim: 'Restore Red Line That Became Blurred'...
REPORT: White House to release intel...




ASSAD SON TAUNTS OBAMA ON FACEBOOK!

BLACK RACIST ROBBER GETS BEAT UP BY WHITES :-)


THE FEEL GOOD STORY OF THE DAY!!!
 
Two suspected robbers left the scene of their own crime looking like the victims of a brutal attack after their...

OBAMA HAMLET: "TO START WW III, OR NOT TO START WW III, THAT IS THE QUESTION..."



15
 
16
 
obamlet
On Syria, it seems Obama’s made up his mind about what to do but then again perhaps he’s not made up his mind at all.

Maybe it’s all a clever strategic head-fake on Obama’s part. I doubt it, however; his slowness to come to a decision in military matters has become legendary.

The whole thing is also an opportunity to visit Hamlet’s famous “To be or not to be” soliloquy on procrastination and the perils of decision-making and gear it to Obama’s predicament. Surprisingly little needed to be changed to make it fit:
To strike, or not to strike: that is the question:
Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous Assad,
Or to take arms against a sea of troubles,
And by opposing end them? To attack: to dither
No more; and by attack to say we end
The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks
That Syria is heir to, ’tis a consummation
Devoutly to be wish’d. To act, to attack;
To attack: perchance to depose: ay, there’s the rub;
For in its wake what next may come
Whether or not Assad shuffles off this worldwide stage,
Should give us pause: there’s the respect
That makes calamity of intervention;
For who would bear the whips and scorns of time,
The oppressor’s wrong, the proud man’s contumely,
The pangs of chemical war, the law’s delay,
The insolence of office and the spurns
That patient merit of the unworthy takes,
When he himself might his mark make
With a bare missile? who would tyrants bear,
To defy the red lines that he drew?
But that the dread of something afterward,
The unknown consequences in whose grip
A legacy might founder, puzzles the will
And makes us rather bear those ills we have
Than fly to others that we know not of?
Thus conscience does make cowards of us all;
And thus the native hue of resolution
Is sicklied o’er with the pale cast of thought,
And enterprises of great pith and moment
With this regard their currents turn awry,
And lose the name of action.–Soft you now!
The fair MSM! Sycophants, in thy orisons
Be all my sins forgotten.
[Neo-neocon is a writer with degrees in law and family therapy, who blogs at neo-neocon.]

SUPPOSE THEY GAVE A WAR AND NOBODY CAME?

OUR POMPOUS LITTLE DICTATOR GETS NO RESPECT FROM ALLIES AND ENEMIES
 
 
White House forced to consider unilateral strikes against Assad after British PM unexpectedly loses key motion on intervention...

Thursday, August 29, 2013

HAPPY WAR DAY - OBAMA RELEASES CRUISE MISSILES!

HEY FOLKS! ENJOY THE OPENING GAME OF WW III ON YOUR WIDE SCREEN HDTVs! THE OPENING MOVE TODAY IS THE MASSIVE CRUISE MISSILES AND BOMBER ATTACKS ON SYRIA! THIS MAY BE FOLLOWED SHORTLY BY A VOLLEY OF ICBMs FROM RUSSIA, CHINA, NORTH KOREA AND OTHER SYRIAN ALLIES! AND ALL THIS DONE WITHOUT A DECLARATION OF WAR BY CONGRESS!


AP: INTELLIGENCE ON CHEMICAL WEAPONS USE NO 'SLAM DUNK'...
NYT: 'No smoking gun' that links Assad to attacks...
UK Cameron backs down on urgent Syria strikes amid revolt...
France changes tone, seeks 'political solution'...
Israelis rush for gas masks, brace for retaliation...
Allies face fight over timetable...
The worst, least-bad scenarios...
Russia sends warships...




OBAMA EYES 'SHOT ACROSS THE BOW'

NEVER UNDERESTIMATE THE POWER OF STUPID PEOPLE


Removing All Doubt: Obama's Syrian Slip-up


A Commentary by J. D. Longstreet
*******************
"It is better to remain silent and allow others to wonder if you are a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt." ... A. Lincoln, President of the United States.
Mr. Lincoln was making an attempt at  paraphrasing the Bible, Proverbs 17:28 to be exact, which says: "Even a fool, when he holdeth his peace, is counted wise: and he that shutteth his lips is esteemed a man of understanding."
It seems to me that the US President would do well to take to heart Proverbs 17:28 -- especially after his "Syrian Slip-up."  
I have often thought , and said as much, that our President talks to much, far too much.

For most of my working life, I was paid to talk.  Not for showcasing my, uh, brilliance, but for the ease with which the ability to express myself seemed to come.  I can report to you now, that it did not come easy for me.  It was LEARNED BEHAVIOR. See, I figured out, as a kid, that a fellow with a good vocabulary and the power to,persuade -- plus the ability to speak in public would never go hungry.   I've been hungry.  Believe me, well-fed is much better.
So, where am I going with all this?  I expect you can guess.
Our President doesn't know when to shut up!
Look, there are two things you can always count on:  One, you will not always be the smartest fellow in the room, and two, there will always be someone ready, willing, and able to call your bluff.
Oh, and there is a third thing (when dealing with despots and terrorists.)  You can't bluff a person willing to lay down his life for his belief.  He has nothing to lose and, he BELIEVES, anyway, that he has everything to gain by dying.  Therefore, you cannot defeat him.  Yes, you can deconstruct his organization, demonize his cause, and kill him.  But you cannot defeat him.
Endeavoring to totally defeat terrorism is akin to squeezing a balloon only to see it bulge in another location.  Squeeze that bulge and another appears.  Thus it is with terrorist organizations.
You would think that after nearly five years of the Obama administration we would no longer be surprised at the administration's amateurish efforts at foreign policy.  About the time we thought we were immune to any more infantile like surprises, Obama went and drew a red line and dared Assad to step over it.  Of COURSE,  Assad stepped over it.  Hell, he had to.  It is basic psychology.  When you are a "strongman" leader and you are challenged, you MUST rise to the challenge. Otherwise you risk being dispatched by your own people and replaced with another strongman who WILL rise to the challenge.
Obama should never have drawn that red line.  However, being the amateur that he is, he did, and now we have no choice but to back it up by going to war (in the middle of a civil war) in a country where there are no US interests and where the outcome, no matter what it is, will not be advantageous for the US.   It doesn't get much crazier than than this.
I can't speak for you but, I must tell you, I am fed-up with my country involving itself in "nation building" especially in the Middle East where it is a lost cause from the git-go.
(By the way, this is a glimpse into what the entire world would look like under global governance.  Constant, never-ending war.)

But, the red line has been crossed and Obama must, repeat, MUST strike.  If he does not follow through,  all the implied threats, going forward, will be seen as hollow, worthless, gestures made by a country that talks big but hasn't the cahones to carry out it's threat. THAT will loose all sorts of mischief on the globe.  US foreign policy, such as it is today, will be a laughing stock. (Not that it isn't a laughing stock today.  Only MORE people will be laughing and a lot louder!)
One must consider what Russia and Iran will do the moment the first US missile or bomb slams into Syrian soil.  Personally, I expect terrorist attacks on Americans in diverse places around the globe.  There have already been rumors that orders have been given for Islamic terrorists to take American hostages forthwith in the event of US military action against Assad.
It is also likely, there may be some jostling of Russian and American naval vessels and combat aircraft. 
Oh, did I say AIRCRAFT?  I did.  Once we learn that cruise missiles can't get the job done alone, expect US manned aircraft to be launched against Assad's forces. (If bomber aircraft are not a part of the original raid.)  There are reports, unconfirmed by this scribe, that US bomber aircraft have been seen flying into British air bases in the immediate area.
Some sources have made much of the fact that the US has not sailed an aircraft carrier into the eastern end of the Med.  It isn't necessary.  The British have military bases, including airbase(s) on the island of Cyprus just off the coast (Approx. 100 miles) of Syria. 
Another question:  Will Obama be able to withstand the withering criticism bound to come rolling in over the deaths of civilians as a result of our bombing and missile strikes?  Does he have the steel to stay the course once he has committed our forces to the task?  All we know of Obama's military prowess so far is his ability to retreat, as in Iraq and Afghanistan.

At the bottom of all this mess, I feel sure, is that damnable UN initiative of "The responsibility to protect" designed to prevent and stop genocides, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity.  Of course, it is just more leftist feel good policy which doesn't do anything toward alleviating the problem, but cost a great many lives of US servicemen and women.
Obama has climbed way out on a limb with his Syrian adventure.  It is almost impossible for it to end well.  Look how Libya ended. Syria stands to be far worse than Libya.
All America can look forward to from our Syrian adventure is more flag draped coffins ... and for what?  No, I mean --FOR WHAT?
© J. D. Longstreet
*****************
VISIT J. D. Longstreet's "INSIGHT on Freedom" Face Book Page!!:   (Just click on the link for more conservative commentary by J. D. Longstreet and other popular conservative writers!) ***********************************************

Here is a little laugh because things are getting really weird....


Pussy Cat Song

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_biZ8b2R0DA

One really wet pussy

Really angry one too.

Tuesday, August 27, 2013

THE GUNS OF AUGUST (PART II) THIRD WORLD WAR SOON

THE ALLIES: US, UK, FRANCE, GERMANY, SAUDI ARABIA, ETC. 

THE CENTRAL POWERS: RUSSIA, CHINA, SYRIA, IRAN, ETC. 

WE HAVE BEEN THERE AND DONE THAT IN AUGUST, 1914....



OBAMA'S WAR...
BUCHANAN: Congress should veto...
Strike within days...
Warplanes begin arriving in Cyprus...
Armed forces 'making contingency plans' for military action...
CAMERON RECALLS PARLIAMENT...
HOLLANDE: France ready to 'punish' Syria...
STOCKS JOLTED...
Russia evacuates 90 people ...
Says West Acting Like 'Monkey With Hand Grenade'...
Top Syrian Official: Obama 'Completely Wrong'; 'Produce The Evidence'...




RUSSIA, CHINA WARN AGAINST STRIKE

American Paranoia Sets In -- Big Time!


A Commentary by J. D. Longstreet
**************
Have you noticed your friends speaking a bit lower and standing a bit closer as they speak to each other recently?  Have you observed, or thought you observed, whispered exchanges between people you know to be friends or even fellow employees?  And have you noticed these exchanges in what is sometimes referred to as neutral locations -- ie -- not the work place or the home?
I'll bet you have.  I have.  Yeah, most of us have IF we take a moment and think back over the past few days.
So, why do I bring this up?  What's the point?
My point is, dear reader, America is changing -- and changing big time -- and it is all happening right before our eyes and we don't seem to recognize the metamorphosis.
Why?  What's happened?
America is no longer a free country. Yeah, I know that is a strong statement.  I intended it to be strong.  I want to shake you up, to get your attention, to pry your eyes away from the TV screen, the computer screen, the cell phone screen, and every other type of electronic device we have today ... long enough to point out that the very thing you are holding in your hand, or sitting in front of and staring at -- has sold you out.
Every time I sit down at the keyboard to write a commentary, I am conscious that I have a captive audience.  I know for certain the US government is interested in every word I say, or type, or transmit.  I am conscious that every time I use certain key words or phrases, little metaphorical red flags go up where ever the heck my commentary is being received by the government.  I must tell you it is more than a little chilling.  Of course, that is one of the side effects of  living in a "surveillance society" such as the United States of America.  Our privacy is gone, zip, kaput!  Twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, all, every single one of us, is now under close observation by the US government.
"Oh," you might say, "Longstreet, you're being paranoid!"  EXACTLY!  That's my point -- EXACTLY!
The entire country is becoming paranoid.  Americans are now carbon copies of the people who used to be citizens of the old Soviet Union.  We're even beginning to LOOK like them.  Their mannerisms have been adopted and then adapted to fit 21st century Americans.
No, we don't have Gulags.  But some SWEAR we DO have FEMA Camps!  (Actually, there are two, uh, camps on the FEMA Camp controversy.  Personally, I'll hold my opinion on that until I can see a camp for myself.) 
Peggy Noonan, in a recent article in the Wall Street Journal, said our loss of privacy will likely change Americans.  She said:  "The end of the expectation that citizens' communications are and will remain private will probably change us as a people, and a country."  SOURCE:  http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323639704579015101857760922.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_sections_opinion
In her article, Ms. Noonan relates how 88 year old Nat Hentoff, a renown journalist and civil libertarian, spoke to a group of students at Harvard.  She said:  "About a year ago he went up to Harvard to speak to a class. He asked, he recalled: "How many of you realize the connection between what's happening with the Fourth Amendment with the First Amendment?" He told the students that if citizens don't have basic privacies—firm protections against the search and seizure of your private communications, for instance—they will be left feeling "threatened." This will make citizens increasingly concerned "about what they say, and they do, and they think." It will have the effect of constricting freedom of expression. Americans will become careful about what they say that can be misunderstood or misinterpreted, and then too careful about what they say that can be understood. The inevitable end of surveillance is self-censorship."  SOURCE:  http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323639704579015101857760922.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_sections_opinion
Please pay careful attention to the last line above:  "The inevitable end of surveillance is self-censorship."  I can tell you, as a conservative writer myself, Mr. Hentoff is "spot on."  All conservative writers, commentators, and such, writing today with a progressive Marxist/communist administration looking over our shoulders 24 hours a day and eavesdropping on everything we say, or write, would be a fool not to be concerned.   Regardless of what we may say publicly, it DOES have a chilling effect upon our writing.  That, dear reader, is NOT an unwelcome effect so far as the current administration is concerned.
Until fairly recently, Americans were a breed apart. We were a free people who governed themselves.  We constructed and then we lived in a free republic.  That has now changed.
The republic that we once had is now unworkable. It has crashed and burned.  Why? Because the government is no longer answerable to the people.  The constitution no longer constrains the government. 
The US government now has only one branch functioning.  Originally designed for three coequal branches, the Legislative, the Judicial and the Executive,  the powerful Obama Executive Branch has either shuttered or co-opted the other two.  What we have today is not constitutional, but it doesn't matter as the constitution itself no longer applies.

There is an expression:  "When someone is out to get you, paranoia is just damned good thinking!"  While it IS true, the political left in America seeks to use our paranoia against us by insisting it is a weakness.   It is they, of course, aiding and betting the usurpers in our nation's capital in the soft despotism that has so quickly stripped America of her freedom and liberty and set her on the road to imminent destruction as a Marxist/communist society.

But then, you shouldn't pay too much attention to my ranting.  I'm paranoid, you know.
© J. D. Longstreet
*************************
VISIT J. D. Longstreet's "INSIGHT on Freedom" Face Book Page!!:   (Just click on the link for more conservative commentary by J. D. Longstreet and other popular conservative writers

ARE YOU ON OBAMA'S RED LIST FOR ASSASSINATION?


ARE YOU ON OBAMA'S RED LIST FOR ASSASSINATION? MORE THAN A FEW PATRIOTS HAVE BEEN MURDERED BY THE REGIME IN THE LAST TWO YEARS!
 Several years ago a good friend of mine enlightened me about the true meaning of the "red" and "blue" lists regarding enemies of the state and disposal ...

THREE OBAMA LAP DOGS TERMINATED WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE BY PATRIOT

082713.jpg

DEMOCRATS! YOU ARE COMMUNISTS, VILE, FILTHY, CORRUPT AND DEGENERATE TRAITORS!


DEMOCRATS: YOU ARE COMMUNISTS, VILE, FILTHY, CORRUPT AND DEGENERATE TRAITORS TO THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC! SO YOU HATE CHRISTIANS, LIBERTARIANS, SOUTHERNERS, REPUBLICANS AND PATRIOTS? I SPIT ON YOU AND RETURN HATE FOR HATE! THIS IS CIVIL WAR! THE ONLY GOOD DEMOCRAT IS A DEAD DEMOCRAT...SPIT! SPIT! SPIT!

THE TIME FOR REVOLUTION AND THE BLOOD PURGE HAS ARRIVED!

You cannot vote the Revolution. You cannot buy the Revolution. You can only be the Revolution. If the torch of freedom doesn't burn in your heart, it is nowhere.

Monday, August 26, 2013

The march to World War III continues..


Clearly, the Syrian government DIDN'T USE chemical weapons - the Iran supported Islamist rebels did - in order to get America and NATO involved, which means Russia and Iran get involved, which means the Third World War.

Nice going TRAITOR OBAMA!

 
United Nations inspectors seeking to establish what happened in a claimed chemical attack came under fire “multiple times by unidentified snipers” on Monday, officials said.

THE TWO STUPID SOCIALIST MEN WHO WILL START WORLD WAR III


They holiday alike; they dress alike; they govern alike; talk alike and now they’re ‘playing’ war alike.  President Barack Obama and British Prime Minister David Cameron are the Bobbsey Twins of their Brave New World.



DEGENERATE OBAMA LOVING MILEY CYRUS ACTS LIKE THE SLUT SHE IS...


 
Miley Cyrus is whoring her way to the top.

ADOLF OBAMA: "The law is what I say it is..."


SYRIA IS PERFECT FOR OBAMA: NO U.S. INTEREST AND THEY WILL HATE US MORE


WH Official: 'Very Little Doubt' Assad Regime Behind Chemical Attack...
Sets Stage for Bigger Role...
Sharp Shift in Tone...
Britain gets ready...
ASSAD: US military will 'fail' like in Vietnam...
Iran warns 'harsh consequences'...
Chemical attack evidence 'may have been destroyed'...
Russia Warns Not to Repeat Past Mistakes...
Iraq-style 'adventure'...
UN inspection team hit by sniper fire...




U.S. READY TO FOLLOW ON SYRIA

SUCCESS: PRESIDENT OBAMA IS POTTY TRAINED!

   
BECAUSE THE EXPERTS FIGURED OUT HE'S A REAL PUSSY!

Democracy Is Dangerous


A Commentary by J. D. Longstreet
*****************
I look at the utter mess in Egypt and I think: THIS is what democracy has wrought!
OK.  Before you climb all over me for my seeming put-down of democracy, hear me out.
I am now more convinced than ever that some people, some nations of peoples,  simple cannot handle democracy.  They are not ready for it.  Some never will be.   The grandiose idea that we, the US, can spread democracy throughout the world has proven to be America's bite too big to chew, and certainly, too big to swallow.
You would think after serial failures in the Middle East, notably, Iraq, Afghanistan, and now Egypt, the US would recognize the utter futility of establishing an American style representative republic in any of those lands where Islamists hold sway.
Freedom is scary and it is dangerous.  Even here in the land of the free, America, where a sizable portion of the citizenry's ancestors had freedom handed to them one hundred and fifty years ago, have yet to learn how to handle it. A century and a half later they still require help from the government that purportedly freed them. Being free is not easy.
In the Muslim countries of the Middle East, their definition of freedom is quite different from our definition.   They have found their freedom within the confines of Shariah Law.  True freedom, such as we enjoy in America, cannot exist in a state in which it must compete with Shariah Law.   If you doubt that, look at Egypt today.   It is a roiling inferno of religious passion, hate, lust for power, despotism, and control.
Imad Eddine Adeeb, an Egyptian columnist, in the pan-Arab newspaper Asharq Al Awsat has said:  "We lack the culture of democracy, and our institutions are still outdated, corrupt and decaying, operating with the same old administrative structures and tattered values and moral codes, all of which have nothing to do with democracy."
SOURCE:   http://www.thenational.ae/thenationalconversation/comment/arabs-not-yet-ready-for-democracy#ixzz2ckAPc3Fa
There are considered to be fourteen countries in the Middle East.  Only two of those countries are electoral democracies.  ONLY TWO.  They are, of course, Israel and Turkey.
It seems that those of us in the west are just beginning to realize the unique challenges of bringing democracy to tribal societies.  We are learning, much to our chagrin, that there are, in fact, some cultures that are simply not, repeat -- NOT,  capable of creating a harmonious society of any kind, democratic, tribal, or otherwise.
A free election does not guarantee the voters in the newly democratic nation will not vote themselves a new dictator.   We've already seen this happen.
My guess is that when all the smoke finally settles in the Middle East and the so-called Arab Spring has finally sprung, the world will be right back where it started -- or very near it.  I expect "strongman" rulers in all the Muslim nations now in turmoil.   Why?  Because the people of those nations are just not ready for a government in which they, themselves, take responsibility for their government.  Maybe in another century or two, but certainly, not now.
In the meantime, the US ought to stop meddling.  Let them alone.  If they want to fight and annihilate each other, more power to them.  Let them have at it.  If, and when, they strike out at us, smack them down -- hard. Otherwise, leave them alone.
Look, it is just extremely difficult for me to become concerned when I see the enemies of my country busily, and industriously, slaughtering each other.  And it seems utterly nonsensical to me for elements within the US government to insist that we supply weapons to help one side, or the other, thereby inserting the US into the middle of a civil war that is, in fact, working to our advantage by decreasing the numbers of our enemies.
One has to wonder if Israel would not be better served if Assad's forces eventually win the ongoing conflict in Syria.  Israel and Assad's governments know and understand each other -- and they know just how far one can push the other.  A new Islamist dictatorship in Syria will almost certainly lead to war with Israel.
As we have seen, democracy did not lead to peace, love, and joy in Egypt.  Why in the world would we think it would do so in Syria should the forces in rebellion to Assad win and decide democracy is the way to go for them, as well.
Yes.  Democracy IS dangerous.  Even a limited democracy, such as our constitutional republic can be dangerous.  With all the checks and balances we have in the US, we have seen how ignorance can produce a socialist/Marxist government in America, the citadel of democracy, itself.
I am of the opinion that we Americans need to clean up around our own doorstep before we go meddling in other nations conflicts.  We have enough problems to keep us occupied for at least a few decades.
© J. D. Longstreet
**********************
VISIT J. D. Longstreet's "INSIGHT on Freedom" Face Book Page!!:   (Just click on the link for more conservative commentary by J. D. Longstreet and other popular conservative writers!)