Tuesday, January 30, 2007

Hitler Comes To Power Today...in 1933


On this date in 1933, Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party moved to the number one slot in the political structure of the German Republic by democratic means that set the standard for the destruction of democracy by legal edicts in other nations over the years, to include most recently, Hugo Chavez and the socialist conquest of formerly democratic Venezuela.

One wonders how many democratic nations in Europe will shortly fall to collectivist control by a "Red-Green Alliance" of Socialists and Islamists? One thing is for certain, the playbook of collectivist coup by democratic means has long been written, approved and tested.
The only question is whether or not this Socialist-Islamist Alliance will last long after democracy is destroyed? When a parallel plot was played out in Russia after Red October in 1917, the alliance of Bolsheviks and Social Revolutionaries only lasted for about seven months until the Bolsheviks were strong enough to destroy their allies in August, 1918 and become the ruling regime. Thus the answer to the question posed: the Islamists would become the sole rulers after making short work of their former allies.
I wonder who the new Leader of Europe will be? "Muhammad Skyhook" of Germany? This is a chilling thought for a cold and dark January day when in my mind's eye I can see the endless lines of Storm Troops in Berlin marching past Hitler in review, shouting in joyful chorus the destruction of a major democracy in Europe.
Excellent article on this theme in The Jerusalem Post:
Islam could soon be the dominant force in a Europe which, in the name of political correctness, has abdicated the battle for cultural and religious control, Prof. Bernard Lewis, the world-renowned Middle Eastern and Islamic scholar, said on Sunday.

The Muslims "seem to be about to take over Europe," Lewis said at a special briefing with the editorial staff of The Jerusalem Post. Asked what this meant for the continent's Jews, he responded, "The outlook for the Jewish communities of Europe is dim." Soon, he warned, the only pertinent question regarding Europe's future would be, "Will it be an Islamized Europe or Europeanized Islam?" The growing sway of Islam in Europe was of particular concern given the rising support within the Islamic world for extremist and terrorist movements, said Lewis.
Lewis, whose numerous books include the recent What Went Wrong?: The Clash Between Islam and Modernity in the Middle East, and The Crisis of Islam: Holy War and Unholy Terror, would set no timetable for this drastic shift in Europe, instead focusing on the process, which he said would be assisted by "immigration and democracy." Instead of fighting the threat, he elaborated, Europeans had given up.

"Europeans are losing their own loyalties and their own self-confidence," he said. "They have no respect for their own culture." Europeans had "surrendered" on every issue with regard to Islam in a mood of "self-abasement," "political correctness" and "multi-culturalism," said Lewis, who was born in London to middle-class Jewish parents but has long lived in the United States.

The threat of extremist Islam goes far beyond Europe, Lewis stressed, turning to the potential impact of Iran going nuclear under its current regime.

The Cold War philosophy of Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD), which prevented the former Soviet Union and the United States from using the nuclear weapons they had targeted at each other, would not apply to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's Iran, said Lewis.

"For him, Mutual Assured Destruction is not a deterrent, it is an inducement," said Lewis of Ahmadinejad. "We know already that they [Iran's ruling ayatollahs] do not give a damn about killing their own people in great numbers. We have seen it again and again. If they kill large numbers of their own people, they are doing them a favor. They are giving them a quick, free pass to heaven. I find all that very alarming," said Lewis.

Lewis acknowledged that Ahmadinejad had made the notion of Iran having the right to acquire a nuclear capability an issue of national pride, and that this should be borne in mind in trying to thwart Teheran's nuclear drive. "One should try to make it clear at all stages that the objection is not Iran having [a nuclear weapon] but to the regime that governs Iran having it," said Lewis.

This idea already had support among those Iranians who, on the one hand, believed that their country has a right to possess such a capability but, on the other, feared it being acquired by a government that they do not support.

Israel and the West should work to strengthen moderate forces within the Iranian population, he urged, via an aggressive propaganda campaign including the use of television and radio programs.

"All the evidence is that the regime is extremely unpopular with their own people," he said. "I am told that the Israeli daily [radio] program in Persian is widely listened to all over Iran with rapt attention." Israel and the West should also be looking to reach out to moderate forces within the Arab world, which are equally alarmed by the spread of extremism in their midst, said Lewis. "The Arab governments understand that Israel is not their biggest problem," said Lewis.

Here too, he said, Israeli media had a positive effect in the region, particularly in Jordan, where Israeli programs were broadcast and were widely watched. Jordanians "get the message of how a free society works. As one fellow put it, it is amazing to watch these great and famous people banging the table and screaming at each other. Even more striking is the fact that Arabs can denounce the Israeli government on Israeli television. That has an impact." Lewis also highlighted the Washington-based Syrian Reform Party, whose leader Farid Ghadry openly admires Israel.

Regarding the summer's war against Hizbullah, Lewis warned that a second such conflict could break out in the near future.

He quoted a Christian Lebanese friend saying soon after the fighting ended that "Israel has lost the war, but Hizbullah has not won" because many people in Lebanon were blaming Hizbullah for bringing conflict to their country. Now, though, he added, it was his sense that Hizbullah had "gained some ground since then."
Amir Mizroch contributed to this report.
A Hat Tip To: Infidel Blogger's Alliance
Another Tip Of The Hat To: Eye On The World

5 comments:

Always On Watch said...

Of late, Bernard Lewis is speaking out strongly and negatively about Islam. He didn't used to have that attitude.

Charles Martel said...

Yep, Lewis is late to the party, but better late than never. Welcome to the war Mr. Lewis. That is if you've the stomach for it.

911truthnc said...

Ronbo,

I stumbled across your blog this evening. 1st of all thank you for service to our nation.

I am a progressive independent. I know what I am going to say is not going to effect in you in the least. So don't think I believe I am doing any good here. I am just saying this because I need too.

I too think Hillary Clinton will be our next dicktator. Politics today have nothing to do with left and right. America is an oligarchy. A society ruled by the extreme wealthy.

America has been stolen by the international bankers. I direct you to a book written by Smedly Butler. Seventy years ago a highly decorated Marine Corps general, disturbed by his participation in various military interventions, declared that WAR IS A RACKET and that we need a CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT to guarantee everlasting peace to our nation.

http://www.warisaracket.org/

The whole war on terror is a farce. A fanasty cooked by the neo-cons, intelligence services, and the pentagon. To take us into the 100 YEAR WAR.
Please check out the Power Of Nightmares.

http://www.wanttoknow.info/powerofnightmares

We need you and your friends to help stop this insanity. Our children have no future if we don't.

George Bush Sr, Bill Clinton, GW Bush, Hillary Clinton are all part of the same criminal organizations trying to create a New World Order.

Our Congress is full of pedophiles. Check out
The Franklin Cover-up written Senator DeCamp.

www.prisonplanet.com/articles/ july2004/210704johndecamp.htm

Your website frightens me. This whole charade of Islamic terrorist is a tool used to keep us sending our children to war. So rich people can keep getting richer.

Think about it. If extemely wealthy people had a conscience. The would be no more hunger or poverty. If you have a conscience. Wouldn't you get to the point. I have enough of material things and power. Now I can save the world.

It would only take 100 billion dollars to end world hunger. We spend that much in 3 months killing innocent lives in Iraq.

I LOVE MY COUNTRY. I WANT IT BACK from the blood sucking moralless leaders who now have it!

9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! Dick Cheney is responsible for 9/11! Bushie boy is a puppet on his string.

Look up The Project of A New American Century,
Rebuilding America's Defenses. The writing is on the wall my friend. We are out to conquer the world and create a NEW WORLD ORDER!


Like
Always On Watch Two said... WAKE UP!

911truthnc said...

PS, Bill Clinton is no fuckin better. WTC explosion is '93 and the Murrah Building in OK City were INSIDE JOBS. Our Leaders have no soul!

Look up DU. Depleted Uranium
http://www.beyondtreason.com

Thornhill said...

I want to chime in re: 911truthnc. Yes, indeed, if folks would read this little book, "War is a Racket" -- really rather an extended pamphlet; only about 25 pages -- it would explain a great deal about the essence of war, the essence of making money. "Peace" is not even a tertiary goal for the U.S.

Here is a handy pie chart for the national budget.

http://www.warresisters.org/piechart.htm

Also, "The Power of Nightmares" is superb and explains many things that are meant to be hidden from view.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/video1037.htm

Almost lastly, "The Good Shepherd," like "TPoN," depicts a strange, yet seemingly everpresent, particularly after WWII, fantasy world that cannot be maintained by reality. In that regard, meet "the Trabant."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trabant

The "cream" of the East German automotive industry, the "Trabbi" was little better than a motorcycle, a lawnmower, even, on four-inflated tires. This was the best that could be manufactured by the most powerful Communist country to the west of the Soviet Union. The Soviets had nothing. They always had nothing, case in point, the Trabbi. Their GDP was, as ours is now, devoted to, and enslaved by, the militay budget. We have learned from our 'adversaries,' and are headed just that way of the Soviets, too, and in more ways than one. This is effectively hidden from public consumption, the American public, that is.